Validitas Atlas Anatomi Tumbuhan Model 4D Untuk SMA Kelas XI

(Validity of 4D Model Plant Anatomy Atlas for Senior High School Grade XI)

Authors

  • Aulia Afza Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Jalan Gunung Pangilun Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat Author
  • Mulyati Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Jalan Gunung Pangilun Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat Author
  • Susi Delfia Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Jalan Gunung Pangilun Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62588/otusedu.2024.v2i3.240

Keywords:

Validity, atlas, plant anatomy

Abstract

Learning resources have an important role in learning process, because they can improve the quality of learning and improve student learning outcomes. Based on the interview, information was obtained that students use textbooks provided by the school in the Biology learning process, Plant Structure and Tissue material. The results of the textbook analysis found several weaknesses, namely that the comparative images of the anatomical structure of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous roots were still black and white and images for each layer of the root structure had not been presented. Therefore, teaching materials are needed that are able to bridge these problems. One alternative teaching material that can be developed is an atlas. The aim of this research is to produce a valid Plant Anatomy Atlas for senior  high school. This research is a development research using a 4D model. This research is limited to the development stage, namely to determine the validity of the developed atlas. The instrument used was the atlas validity analysis questionnaire. Data analysis techniques using percentage formulas. The results of the study showed that the validity value of the atlas was 90.79% with very valid criteria. It can be concluded that the Atlas of Plant Anatomy for high schools that was developed is valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achera, L.J., R.R. Belecina, and M.D. Garvida. (2015). The Effect of Group Guided Discovery Approach on Theperformance of Students in Geometry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME). 1(1):331-342.

Ales, L., Bellofatto, A. A., & Wang, J. J. (2017). Taxing Atlas: Executive compensation, firm size, and their impact on optimal top income tax rates. Review of Economic Dynamics, 26,62–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.02.007

Afza, A. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi berorientasi Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) bermuatan Karakter. Jurnal BioConcetta. 2(1):128-141.

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Palangkaraya: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Cartono, Y. Ibrahim, C. Tresnawati, dan N. Nurdiani. (2015). Pengembangan Model Assesment Autentik guna Menilai Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Kegiatan Praktik Lapangan Calon Guru Biologi. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA. 20(1):82-87.

Gloy, K., Weyhe, P., Nerenz, E., Kaluschke, M., Uslar, V., Zachmann, G., & Weyhe, D. (2022). Immersive anatomy atlas: Learning factual medical knowledge in a virtual reality environment. Anatomical Sciences Education.

Hidayati, N. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia berbasis Lingkungan Hidup Terintegrasi dalam Pembelajaran Membaca dan Menulis Teks Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Turen Tahun 2015. Jurnal NOSI.4(1):68-80.

Jufri, W. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Sains Modal Dasar Menjadi Guru Profesiona. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Kosasih. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.Jakarta Timur: PT Bumi Aksara.

M’alpine,F.C.S. (1883). Botanical Atlas A Guide to Practical Study. New York:The Century Co.

Ningtyas, N. dan T.N.H. Yunianta. (2014). Pengembangan Handout Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas III. Jurnal Scholaria. 4(3):42-53.

Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta DIVA PRESS.

Purnama, S. (2010). Elemen Warna dalam Pengembangan Multimedia PAI. Al-Bidayah. 2 (1) : 113-129.

Riduwan. (2007). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan, dan Penelitian Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tjitrosoepomo, G. 1991. Taksonomi Umum (Dasar-dasar Taksonomi Tumbuhan). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesaian Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.

Wiono, J. W. (2024). Efektivitas Atlas Elektronik Bermuatan Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan TNBBS dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Berdiferensiasi. BIOEDUKASI Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro. 15 (1) : 29-38.

Wulansari, L. D. (2015). Pengembangan Atlas Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan: Euphorbiales, Myrtales, dan Solanales sebagai Sarana Identifikasi. Bioedu. 4 (3) : 1029-1035.

Zolhavarich, S.M., and Vatanchian, M. (2014). Anatomical Sciences. Development of an Anaglyph Anatomical Atlas of Rabbit as a New Generation of Printable 3D Anatomical Atlases. 11 (1) : 59-65.

Downloads

Published

07-02-2025

How to Cite

Aulia Afza, Mulyati, & Susi Delfia. (2025). Validitas Atlas Anatomi Tumbuhan Model 4D Untuk SMA Kelas XI: (Validity of 4D Model Plant Anatomy Atlas for Senior High School Grade XI). Otus Education: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 2(3), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.62588/otusedu.2024.v2i3.240

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>